Good answer, Don. Thanks and not just because I happen to agree:-) It makes sense that the statements made by the killer and witnessed by others are the best thing we have to determine his reasons. He said it in response to the British army killing Moslems. It was, therefore, to him an act of both political and religious significance. Either side saying one is valid and the other is not is transparently nonsense.

Yes, I know you are not Jim and you do not want that comparison making so I apologise for using your sage words as an example to all that no side of the equation can be ignored. It is what I have been trying to say all along.

Cheers

DtG