Bobert: "What evidence???"
"There's more politics in this case than Carter has liver pills..."

Quit being silly...they only disallowed the unintelligible phone call recording, and both sides had their 'expert' witness, to refute each other.
It sounds to me, that the real evidence that the DO have, is just not the stuff fits your politics.

You've already decided, without hearing all the evidence, or even before the trial's over, how you want it to go, so ANY evidence that doesn't go 'your way', is considered, "What evidence???"

Watch a good football game, if you want to root for a team, one way or the other. Trials are different...they just want to get to the facts...no biases, one way or the other.

I haven't been on this thread, merely because I figured, it would be a battle of wits, for witless bigots....trying to ensure that their personal discriminations, one way or the other, would rule the day!
....nor have I 'promoted' one side or the other. All I've said was, "Let the verdict come in according to the EVIDENCE, not political posturing."
Something wrong with that..................too?

GfS