The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #151371   Message #3532830
Posted By: GUEST,Fred McCormick
02-Jul-13 - 11:33 AM
Thread Name: Field recording in the UK
Subject: RE: Field recording in the UK
Hootenanny. You're right. there never was anyone comparable to Ralph Peer operating here in the UK. That's partly because commercial recording of traditional musicians happened on a smaller scale here than in the the USA. Mainly though, it's because the people Peer recorded mostly lived in remote parts of the American south. Therefore, for a musician to travel to Camden, New Jersey, where the Victor Record Company was based usually entailed a lengthy and prohibitively expensive journey.

Over here, on the other hand, for a commercial record company to record a traditional musician - and a remarkable number did end up on commercial records - merely entailed that musician travelling to London, Glasgow or Dublin, where the record companies were based.

What's more, Peer wasn't a field recorder as such. IE., unlike conventional folk music collectors, he didn't seek out musicians and record them in their own homes or wherever. Rather, he would pick a suitable location (EG., the Bristol Sessions of 1927 were conducted in a disused hat factory) and fit it up so that it was in effect a purpose built studio.