The sad thing is that you are unwilling to address the facts, and insist on attacking those you disagree with.

This indicates that you have no factual basis for your opinions, and thus have to attck the person who points out things that do not meet your desired view.


I was asked to give a POSSIBLE example of evidence that COULD have been in the information withheld by the Prosecution- I did so, even if Bobert and Richard have continued to lie and claim I did not. If it is withheld, a mistrial could be declared, and I doubt anyone wants that- thou I suspect Bobert will support social unrest and riots regardless of what happens, just so he can claim that anyone who disagrees with him is racist.

I have presented the information avaliable from the trial, while others present only unsupported opinions.


The sad thing is that you are the representatives of those who disagree with me- what a letdown for the Liberals of the world, if you are the best that they can do.