oh dear!circular reasoning-therefore the theological understanding must be wrong.
i think its called elephant hurling when a lot of generalizations and assertions are thrown about.
you appeal to the late st gould for support asserting that evolutionism is all cut dried.
i could do the same with some highly qualified scientists also.
what would you think of that?...thought so!
what i did was give a specific example-which you dismissed as inadmissable.
there is no dodging it,-soft tissue,DNA,and protein,blood vessels as well ,i think,has been found in dino bones.all of this could not have survived 60 MYO.
AT LEAST SCIENTISTS USED TO SAY SO!.if they have changed their mind,it just indicates that dogma is driving the science.
so with respect bill,i hope you dont do a steve on me and evade specifics .
and you dont need to do an exhaustive search of darwinist proofs.one at a time will do,and if i can,t find an answer i will admit it.
and i will think no less of you if you have to do the same
regards pete.