i shall have to concede defeat,bill,as regards the tecnicalities of logical fallacies.
however,it seems to me that you are appealing to the fact that the greater number of scientists accept darwinism.
my point is that if for example,copernicus and galileo had accepted that the greater number of scientists must be correct,we might still have a geocentric cosmology.
you seem to be under the impression that i am afraid to face facts lest my belief in the bible record is destroyed, and as a consequence my faith. firstly,were that the case,i would not be engaging in discussion.secondly my comments were adressing a question from little hawk and in no way expressing insecurity.thirdly,it is facts that i prefer to address rather than broad assertions.
i am still pressing you on the dino DNA and other perishable elements.
for example ,it is my understanding that even given the most favourable conditions DNA could only last a fraction of 65MYO timescale claimed by darwiists.

btw- do you know of any astronomers who claim the moon is made out of green cheese?
or is that a not so subtle argument by ridicule-
i know - probably not tecnically correct
but it sure looks that way.