amen to the wry grin,bill.
i happily concede CMI is my main source,but i have often read yours and others links.i have just read robs link.it does not seem to support robs suggestion of contamination.
but then again,maybe i misunderstand him as he seems to imply re diamonds discussion.as far as that goes i cant remember the details now but i do understand that diamond is very resistant to contamination,though i remember penny claiming it could be.
the rob link stressed that this possibility was eliminated.contamination claims in the laboratory ,of course, cast doubt either on the lab or the method in general.the dino findings seem pretty much authenticated,despite the disbelief and opposition described.just goes to show just how much some evolutionists follow the evidence wherever it leads-smile.
i am often charged with being closed to the evidence.i wonder how much soft tissue and DNA etc has to be found in dinos and diamonds before darwinists abandon their faith in long ages.
i predict it wont happen for most.they will just decide it did get preserved ,however much they find.