part 2
credit to you bill if you look up the info.
i am surprised that jack suspects some frivolous purpose in posting in this discussion.i take my faith and the defense of what i believe seriously.for Gods honour and concern for unbelievers.i think you and i,bill,have communicated long enough for you at least to accept that i am telling the truth.
in the previous post you claimed or implied,i think,that the current mass of data rendered the creationist position very implausible.i would counter by saying that we all have the same data - it is the interpretation of it that matters.it is a matter of competing worldviews.nevertheless i think it worth challenging specfic points.
all the rest is tossing assertions around.
while confessing my faith in the bible as trustworthy and reliable, i have not majored on it here. by contrast evolutionists often offer theological objections to discussion of origins.
you are bordering on that,and while i dont wish to seem evasive,-at this stage i am stressing that some cause/maker is consistent with our experience in life of anything else that is made.or of life only coming from life .
i say again ,to posit what is never seen or proved is a faith position.