The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #150984   Message #3537758
Posted By: beardedbruce
15-Jul-13 - 01:52 PM
Thread Name: BS: George Zimmerman defense-' Evidence withheld'
Subject: RE: BS: Zimmerman defense-' Evidence withheld'
"a classic opening for a vigilante, a mugger, or just a n****r hating cracker."

Or anyone else, seeing a person they did not know in an area they lived in. I do it all the time- and ask if I can help them.

"I would not assume that his attentions were friendly, would you?"

I would not assume his attentions were NOT friendly- but then we judge others by how we would have said it.




"2. This stranger (by his own account of events), without further conversation, reaches for a pocket."

Actually, he stated that he reached for the phone after Trevon said "You do now" So there was conversation.



"Now you have the conditions for a reaction based upon a genuine fear of bodily harm or death. A classic situation of self defence by Tayvon Martin."




Who threw the first punch? Being asked a question does not justify throwing a punch.


Very well. The next time I meet someone on a dark night, and they ask me what I am doing there, if their hands are not visible I will assume they have a gun and I will jump them and pound their head into a bloody pulp- you have stated that is ok. And I will expect all those here that think Zimmerman guilty to take to the streets and support me, regardless of the race of the individual I kill- or be proven racist scum like Greggie boy.