point to you frogprince.after I posted that little joke,it occurred to me that someone would comment on it not being a straight analogy.and admittedly I would not have put it as precisely as you anyway.
of course I expected the usual suspects would chime in with their usual scientific ! and intelligent ! contributions,and demonstrate how much of worth they can contribute.
but if we stick with the flys,- as they reproduce so rapidly ,why is it unreasonable to expect some kind development far beyond what is offered,if evolutionism were true.
on the contrary many ,if not most supposedly MYO fossils are virtually identical to the modern organism.stasis seems to be the order of the day = or deep time!

bill- just to clarify,-I should have thought that even though an expert like you may pull me up on a logical fallacy, it does not follow that the overall argument is wrong.
it seems sort of like the brilliant lawyer that can get a crook off the hook by aguing technicalities.