I am quite aware that Darwinism posits that only one line out of several may lead beyond the bounds of observable natural selection in a given organism...

...however it still means that for the many examples of stasis, you have to posit that they remained much the same despite changing selective pressures.

There you go. A man chuntering on about something he has absolutely no idea about. Utterly meaningless drivel from start to finish. Go, Bill. He's your baby.