Sorry, Amos. Because a conclusion is different it does not mean the thought process is broken. I will accept Different Thinkerator Syndrome but definitely not defective. If we accept that someone's brain is defective because they have an opposing viewpoint then where do we take it from there? Giving them no voice? Not letting them vote? Selective culling?

I believe the whole principle is a bag of shit and if that makes my 'thinkerator' defective in your eyes then so be it. I give thanks that you are not in a position of power.

DtG