when I say that too many Christians are giving more credence to Darwin than the plain reading of the historical narrative of genesis [and other scriptures that support that reading]. I am not saying that those who do trust the scripture do so in the face of evidence to the contrary, as I am sure you realize.
I realize I have expanded on that btw.
in fact I would say that evolutionists believe in that despite all the evidence to the contrary.
take the CMB referenced in the cosmology link - that was the theme of an article by dr john Hartnett on creation.com in the last week.
and just as you confessed to not understanding all the math, so I was lost on the detail in the Hartnett article.
the point is, your presupposition that evolutionism is true leads you to trust the scientists that interpret the data evolutionly.
and I of course admit to trusting scientists who believe the bible = and find scientific evidence in support of that presupposition.
but even not understanding all that heavy stuff,there is still a lot of arguments I can grasp ,things that evolutionists have to do drastic science revision on to bolster up Darwinism.