did I specify dna bill? .I probably mentioned it way back, but not this time, because that is not as firmly established as other soft tissue find in dinos.
when mary swittzer first made her discoveries she could not believe what she had found till multiple testings were done.
I take that as being in common with other MYO believers,could not believe such soft tissue would survive that long.
if steve can quote scientists that were on record pre 90.s that expected it ,he may have an argument.
but failing that- we have the situation of evidence of very much younger dinos being ignored because of evolutionary mindset.
so again I ask,- are not they now saying that soft tissue[eg blood residue] must be able to survive - because they [supposedly] know dinos lived millennia past?