"It was put at the very end because it kills the story."
It was put at the end because it was an earlier government denial, repeated because of the fact that the matter is to be debated in Parliament - that's just about how dead it is.
Selling components for chemical weapons to human rights abusers is never "dead" - the victims of those weapons often are, or blinded and maimed, but it remains an act tantamount to aiding and abetting war criminals to commit war crimes, or in this case, the intention to do so.
You have refused to address Britain's record on selling weapons to war criminals, actual or potential and have entered into your 'repetition' mode - you are now filibustering; I have little doubt that you will contiune to ignore Britain's selling arms to murderous despots.
All of which more-or-less has decided me that, if I do have cause to report you for attempting to block my right to express an opinion by using my 'non-residence' or if you (or any of your mates - One for all and all for on) once more suggest that I am mentally unstable, anti British or Anti-Semitic for criticising Britain's Arms sales policy or Israel's human rights abuses - or anything else on this forum, I will include a complaint on your filibustering tactics.
Have a good day.
Jim Carroll