""NOBODY has come up with ANY proof that Syria is the one who used them"".


Is that a fact, gfs - I note you do use the word "any" quite loosely. An odd approach for a person who accuses others of "jumping the gun" and advancing conspiracies. It is totally unreasonable to submit that some folks "in high office" have presented such proof to those in positions of trust in their governments, but not made it public - or to you directly and the public just haven"t seen it? Do you actually believe what you read in the media is thee full, unbiased information on reality?

In the world of high tech surveillance, very little escapes those with the technology and people in the right places to report back. Do you actually think that everything the Russians, the Iranians, the Syrians, the USA'ers, Israel has learned through various forms of espionage is actualy put in the public domain, to compromise such operation?

You seem to state out of one side of your posts that "we don't know, yet you tip the scales on the other side to say that Assad did not do it. Where is the proof that this is based on?


I suspect there are plenty of reasons to distrust what is put forward by those on all sides, and likely reasons that may seem quite strategic to them (at the time of the incident) to take such actions. Have you been personally briefed by all the parties involved on this, gfs?

A good question is who benefits the most out of what is occurring now, as it has evolved?