When you put forward a theory it is your burden to give evidence that it is so, ake. Your last post seems to be saying that a newspaper puts a theory forward, and unless there is evidence that it is so, then it is logical to believe it as such. Not a logical approach. There are many cases where people are led astray by such thinking. It reminds me of Astrology or similar exploits, not logical deductIon.

Maybe many have a favourite team or theory. But, mostly seeking for reasons to reinforce it-them seems to lead nowhere, IMO.