musket seems to be under the misconception that I was claiming Christians never lie.
read my last post again maybe. I said that for them to do so was inconsistent. this is because those doing so , and indeed clerical abusers of kids, are not heeding the God they claimed to serve.
but for the atheist,-can he point to a fixed standard?

IMO ,shimrod the reviewing system for submissions is philosophically dismissive of creationist scientists. the scientists in galileos day were slow catching on as well .
it should be noted that we are not talking of papers full of bible texts, but reasoned only from the scientific perpective.
I also hear that there are numerous submissions, so I would presume papers not agreeing with the reviewers worldview would have even less chance.

so soon, stu. nice talking to you.

griska - a large number of scientists used to subscribe to other things in the past that are now discarded.
seems that you have not read much creationist stuff because speciation is part of the model. the information was contained in the original animals from which the species descended ,mostly from losses in info ,I believe.
as to theologians accepting Darwinism, seems to me they are sawing off the branch they are sitting on.