" ... the particles to people story is full of holes, not to say illogical."

No more illogical than believing that some superbeing made everything ... out of what? And where did He come from and what is He made of?

Also, pete, I think that you ought to think more deeply about the differences between "unbelievable", "improbable" and "impossible".

You find "particles to people" unbelievable - others don't; you assign it a low probability - others assign it a higher probability. I, and others involved in this discussion, assign a low probability to the existence of God - you, on the other hand, assign to His existence a probability of 1.0 or 100% - even though you have no proof of His existence (now THAT'S illogical!).

" ... this sounds like an admission that it cannot be demonstrated to be established fact. I have before quoted evolutionists admitting as much."

No, evolutionary scientists, like all true scientists, assign probabilities to their conclusions - and rarely, if ever, do they assign a probability of 100%. This is NOT an admission that they have reached the wrong conclusion. And, for the umpty-millionth time, YOU CANNOT INSERT THE BIBLICAL CREATION STORY INTO THE GAPS!!!!