Can you repeat my thread again and again Keith?

Perhaps one day you just might read it....

Just catching up on the periodicals in the post whilst I have been away. The Week has reprinted an article from the previous week's Observer by John L Allen Jr (with a name that like he can only be an emissary from Dumbfuckistan) all about Christian persecution. A previous Archbishop of Canterbury was on the radio a while ago saying we persecute Christians in The UK.

Is the point of the exercise to keep maliciously pointing out atrocities and comparing them to increasing irrelevance in a modern free thinking society?

I find such comparisons abhorrent, disgusting and below any moral value most humans exhibit. When you next get to pick and choose which bits of Christianity are in fashion, can you quietly drop the trait of using any far fetched story to scare people into stopping questioning your cult?

Also, as you like asking me to answer any questions, here's one for you. Many Christians believe. They have belief. As your issues with your so called faith can't even get beyond the first sentence of the first book of the bible, under what terms do you call yourself a Christian? And how does that distinguish you from any normal person who doesn't see themselves as a Christian?