Michael - also without wishing to hijack this thread, I find myself shaking my head at your belief in a Diana conspiracy theory.

You challenge us to say how the driver of the car (Paul) became drunk - simply because you believe that "respected professional driver entrusted with a distinguished passenger. Such a man would never have allowed himself to get pissed on such an occasion."

Well, that's just an assertion on your part. For my part, it's my belief that a respected professional driver etc. could just as likely have slipped up - even Homer nods - and been in a less than fit state on that occasion. The British inquest judge concluded that there wasn't a shred of evidence to prove that Diana had been killed by any other reason than through the condition and misjudgement of the driver and the fact that none of the occupants of the car was using a seat belt.

I respect your personal view of the case - but it's your assertion, and no factual basis on which to challenge us to an alternative theory. I have to say that, if I were of a devious and murderous disposition, and in a position to be able to plot the death of an unwanted Royal, I can think of many other more subtle and less tendentious ways to carry out the operation.