Musket, I may have drawn a wrong conclusion about precisely whom your previous post was targeted at (in all honesty, I don't think I am mistaken, and I do think your latest post is one more example of your moving the goalposts around and talking gobbledygook as a deflection/spoiling tactic in the battle of wits you so clearly (and by your own admission) take such great delight in!) but you would make it much clearer, in a thread like this where people are jumping in and cross-posting, if you indicated to whom you're speaking. But, of course, you don't because the implication of "if the cap fits, wear it" followed by "what on earth made you think I meant you?" suits your way of 'winning' by confabulation!   :-)

You and I both know it!

So, on with the debate about mr. brand (lower case initial letters intended) - I've said all I intend to say about that person, I'll stick to lurking and reading now that greater minds than either yours or mine have joined the fray!   :-)