too late to post much but-
Darwin admitted that the data he collected to formulate his idea could as well be otherwise interpreted.
you are still equivocating. evolutionism is not the same thing as natural selection, which is part of the creationist model ,and was pre-Darwin.
I don't think any of stu's examples of evolutionism being of use to operational science are demonstrated to fulfil that promise.

I do not recall any hateful lanquage used about homosexuals in akenatons posts. disagreement does not constitute homophobia, and if he is correct in his statistical analysis ,he is being more caring than the PC brigade, whatever stonewall might say about it.