ok musket I read your reasoning, and agree that that suggestion, if accurate does seem discrimatory. I still , however suspect that you make an unwarranted assumption that hateful motive is behind it.

I was asked about- yea challenged- to give examples of creationist thinking advancing science.
dr russel Humphries made predictions about mercury and Neptune based on a creationist model, which was massively more accurate than evolutionist predictions when voyager space craft passed those planets.
vestigial organs, stu?. sorry if that was unclear-
evolutionary thinking expected that there would be useless leftovers from the evolutionary process, and used to cite several.
we now know that they were wrong and that their Darwin bias thus hindered science.
same with dna - expected leftover junk, but increasingly shown to be erroneous.