shimrod- best I can see ,most of the creationist reasoning appeals to natural processes with the exception being the creation event itself.
that is not to say of course that other miraculous events following in the bible have to be explained naturalistically .if I am going to believe in God, surely it is senseless to think that he be unable to facilitate the creation event, provide a sea creature able to swallow and vomit a prophet, and raise the Saviour from the dead, among other things recorded in scripture.
so I say again - what you posit are events and processes that are contrary to known science.
something from nothing via no one
miracle without miracle maker.
who is he that wants it both ways?