Don T.:   ". . . if the insurance company concerned refuses to bring its terms of business up to the minimum standard required, it is the insurance company which is preventing continuity, not Obama.

This is the important distinction which apparently completely escapes the notice of the very bigotted Songwronger."

Nobody, Don T. and Greg F. in the two above posts have made my point abundantly clear, and I suggest you read both of their posts very closely.

Further above, I said this. And I added that if, for example, the law requires that you have full insurance on your automobile, and all YOU have is collision, the law would be remiss if it did not require that you get liability insurance or change to a company that will provide it.

Same principle. And it should be self-evident!

Don Firth