Grishka

Snail, you are wasting your time (as I wrote before). We may write what we please, but should not try to argue with those who play a game with different rules

You're probably right but, in a way, it is giving Steve the opportunity to demonstrate that he does play to different rules that is part of the point. Actually, he seems to have learnt some of those rules from pete like ignoring evidence that doesn't suit you and avoiding answering awkward questions. Notice how he failed to take up the opportunity to clarify his position on whether his belief in evolution was pragmatic or fundamental or to say whether or not he thought Stu was talking bollocks. Instead he resorted to his usual tactics of playground abuse and pathetic character attacks.

Steve is potentially far more dangerous than pete or Jack the Sailor. He claims to be a scientist but is actually fundamentally anti-science, rejecting everything that makes it different from religion.