if you want to cite the faults of the religious ,past or present, I can surely cite the evil of evolution believers, if you wanna go down that path again.
so ,I think your argument flawed, but at least there was one, unlike steve who sounds like the needles stuck...evolution true ,darwin elegant, creationists evil...ad nauseum.

It's "ad nauseam" you ignorant git. Additionally, there are no "evolution believers". I mean, how many bloody times do we have to tell you this? Are you completely bloody stupid or what? You do not "believe" in a tenet of science. You weigh up the EVIDENCE (did you manage to read that word or shall we give you a few dictionary references for it?) and you come to a conclusion based on that EVIDENCE. You do not "have faith" or "believe in it". Only twats such as yourself apply such low-bar qualifications to the stuff you're force-fed with. We scientific types are sceptical by default. Tell us to "believe" stuff and we tell you to sod off (so sod off). We accept nothing without EVIDENCE and the EVIDENCE bar is set very high (you wouldn't understand, of course, because nothing you believe in can be corroborated by EVIDENCE). Also, do apprise us of evil done by advocates of evolution. Real evolution, not the nonsense your silly websites tell you about social "Darwinism" or Hitler (who, had he been alive today, would have been one hundred percent on your side. As yanks say, go bloody figure).