usual bible vs science misrepresentation, shimrod.
like it or not, not all scientists are evolutionist.
I suspect there were people like you that told galileo that his idea was anti science too.
granted the evidence does not prove the bible correct directly. it does however support a younger creation than the aeons posited by evolutionism [eg dna, soft tissue, blood residue in dinos] and thus the bible is more consistent with the data IMO.

Stu says " so much wrong with.............." without saying what.
granted I may not talk in scientific terms but I think I am essentially correct, though incomplete, and of course he reject the conclusion.

going back to the post from don, pt 2-
the biblical scribes almost certainly had no idea of the vastness of space , but of course GOD did, and Christians believe he inspired the writings.
take gen 15 v 5,   22 v 17 jerimiah 33 v 22. the stars visible at night could be counted, so a comparison with grains of sand might seem a poor comparison. we now know that is not the case and I think stars are uncountable , more being discovered as probes reach further.