however, as the theist posits a creator, there is a logical source to creation.

There certainly is not. Logic has to take a permanent back seat in creationist dogma, old chap. If you don't agree, stop faffing around and tell us your logical basis for the existence of God. Come along, we're waiting...

shimrod may keep evading that by his "who made..etc....",and we could argue as to the being of the creator, or if he needed a creator

Typical pete dishonesty (how the hell do you live with your conscience?) The person who is doing the evading is you. Please answer: where did your God come from? It's a child's question but it's the most profound question ever to confront religion, and, if you can't answer it, you're stuffed. It really is as simple as that. Stop accusing other people of evasion and answer that question. Piss or get off the pot.

but fact remains that there is no evidence for abiogenesis

The evidence for what you call abiogenesis (I don't need to call it that, but hey) is all around you, in its diversity, abundance and beauty. The Earth was a fireball that became the home for life. That's a wonderful notion and you are not going to spoil it with your banal notions of a big bearded all-seeing bloke (where was his missus?) who you can't explain mucking in to make it all.

Actually, where was his missus? Girls??? I'd be nowhere without the missus. What makes God so bloody special? Shall there be womanly times, or shall we die? Franny??