Nor "end of" Stu, I agree with some of what you say, for example that animals are not lesser, I only used "lower" to distinguish the human species from other animals.....I suppose to be perfectly accurate, I should have used "higher" rather than "lower".
I don't agree about the status of homosexuality as presented by you,
You do not address the negative aspects like sexual health rates, or where homosexuals are to fit into society, their interaction with the many worldwide, who see their behaviour as "unnatural".

The crux seem to me to be the fact that homosexual couples cannot reproduce and without help from heterosexuals they can never fulfil themselves by producing or nurturing offspring.
This in itself is against the primary law of nature, which is that the species must survive.

I will say, that you are obviously sincere in your views and are also much better educated than I, but I am yet to be convinced by what you have written so far. I would like to see you tackle the negative aspects of male homosexual behaviour.....there seems to be a difference between the sexual health of homosexuals , male and female.
Do you feel able to explain this?