The bicker "my historians are better than yours" is very childish, particularly when we do not know what single statement is being debated/challenged

The bicker actually is "historians know nothing compared to Muppet and mates."

My case from the start of the first thread was just 3 points.
Britain had no choice but to resist the German onslaught.
The British people overwhelmingly understood and accepted that.
The British army was not badly led.

I have shown that historians support all those points.
None of you have produced anything from any living person to contradict it, but still you try to shout me down.

Grishka, you call me "primitive."

I do not know what you mean by that, and I do not care.
You are arguing against historians.
If this were an intelligent debate, you would all shut up and admit you have nothing, absolutely nothing, to support your case.