"That is the position of you, Musket and co."
No it isn't - it is the view of all historians apart from the tiny handful you have sought out - several of these have made it clear by writing that "the current thinking on World War One" must be changed - if you can't believe the evidence of your own witnesses why do you persist in this farce?
"You were unable to produce anything but the discredited work of long dead historians."
They have not been didscredited - they have been challenged on some points only by your tiny handful of your obscure historians and you7r tabloid journalist.
If these people have been "discredited", tell us when it happened and what has been "discredited, and by whom.
These are among Britain's leading historians and highest respected historian - if this is not the case you are also challenging the biographical entries of them - show us where they are in any way "discreditd" - you meglomanic nutter.
"I am done with casting pearls before swine."
Arrogant prick
"You can call acclaimed and eminent historians "journalists""
Max clifford - whoops Hastings - is a journalist who presently works for a tabloid newspaper - he has no professional historical qualifications whatever - go and look up his biographical entry.
As James Cagney once said just before he was blown to smithereens - "Top of the world ma"
Get help
Jim Carroll