None of this any any way supports your arrogantly presented antique claims none of it
Where are your "established historian"
Where is your wholesale rebuttal of the established view.
None of this in any way alters the taught facts about the war - they are minor challenges by a minute number of obscure historians - how many qualified historian are there practicing in Britain today who have not questioned the way WW2 is now fully accepted to have happened?   
Where is your evidence that the real established historians were wrong
You accused me of dredging the net for information - you are now doing exactly that and coming up with the same cut-'n-pastes you have already put up
You are now beginning to rant
As I said - "Top of the world Ma"
Jim Carroll
Bit of a relief that you've decided to continue "casting your pearls before swine" - thought I was going to have to dig out an old Monty Python DVD