I don't know where to start?

Dave the Gnome puts it in a nutshell regarding what is acceptable. Consenting sex by both parties is acceptable.

Still not sure why the fascination with sex is part of this though. After all, not everybody indulges. If we go by the evidence we have, it says anal sex is the most successful way to transmit viruses. After all, the French even stick pain killers up their bottom, as the fastest way to get into the bloodstream. Hence viriaemia and bactoraemia like the bot bot. The other bit of evidence, here in The UK by certain Royal Colleges, in particular The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, suggest that recipients of anal sex in The UK are 85 % women. (Sourced by presentation where anal sex is noted for clinically relevance such as colo rectal concerns.) Add that to the estimates Keith A Hole of Hertford keeps throwing around that only a third of undiagnosed HIV affects gay men, and you start to see why it is so frustrating to see people accept the terrible slur that HIV is a gay issue. It is a people issue.

The relevance to this thread.   Excellent example of narrow minded fools spreading propaganda in order to denigrate a section of society. A bit like God botherers slurring rational people, calling them militant atheists just because they don't accept superstition as fact, or wish to be told how to behave.

Oy Jerk! Any chance, when saying I break the rules, of noting Goofus saying my Dad had a pair of tits?

Thought not.

You don't care about any rules really. Only as a tool to gag people who see through your approach. False fool.