"Your cut/paste in black text supports exactly my case."
It does no such thing - even if it did, why on earth ignore the bit in red text.
It points out that the crimes being discussed are those of a tiny minority of young criminals and there is no evidence whatever to link them to either the religion or the race of those criminals - Jack Straw, the judiciary, the police, the social workers the enqiry into the connection between race, culture and criminality have all stated this over and over again
You and your friend's attitude has, on the other hand, attempted to brand every single member of the British Muslim community as "implanted" perverts and potential terrorists - slaves to their "culture", though neither of you have ever attempted to show which particular aspects of that culture have made them what they are.
Straw and British authorities specifically warned against the acts a "tiny minority of criminals" being used against the Muslim population as a whole - that is exactly what you have done and are continuing to do here.
The above article includes this warning, yet you are claiming it as my having "shot myself in the foot" - what school did you go to Mike - tell us again?
For several years now Keith has openly used this forum as a platform for race and cultural hate.
He has deliberately and openly attempted to present the Muslim population, and Islam as a whole as terrorists and potential sexual perverts, the only reason that their perversions haven't materialised being that some have managed to resist their "implant" - the stuff horror science is made of - they are all "Manchurian Candidates in our midst.
Single handedly he took over, drifted and dominated the largest hate thread on this forum; it was started by someone pointing out that Muslim prejudice had become "a respectable form of bigotry in Britain" - Keith turned it into a sewer of hate directed against a community of a million plus human beings who are recognised as being quiet, respectable, industrious and desirous of bettering themselves educationally
As British citizens - they have recently been officially recognised as being the ethnic community who have most likely to embrace British citizenship, despite being among the most deprived and persecuted.
Despite this fact - it was on this thread that Keith chose to depict them as implanted monsters.
On a later thread (the murdered soldier) he depicted them as potential terrorists ad killers - a potential terrorist enemy within.
Most recently he set out to prove that the Muslim threat was not just in Britain, but a world-wide one.
He scraped the bottom of the barrel by vehemently supporting one of the largest cut-'n-pastes presented on this forum, lifted directly from an openly Islamophobic/racist site.
He said he had examined many of the accusations of murder and persecution taken from that site, refused to present his findings challenged us to "disprove them" - most of them were untraceable and of those that weren't, only a tiny number carried any proof whatever that they were religiously inspired.
That has been the level of his "evidence" from the beginning of his campaign - he has had no supporters, other than Mike, who nips in and out whenever he gets in trouble, and 'little Boo Boo' wo does the donkey work in seeking out is seeking out such sites as 'Islamwatch', 'Jihadwatch' and 'White Supremacy' - all of which have provided 'evidence' during the course of these arguments.
Despite his lack of support, Keith has just openly declared himself "damn near infallible" on the question of the Muslim culture - how s that for "shooting yourself in the foot Mike"?
We are all surrounded by our various cultures.
None of us are slaves to it, as Keith would have us believe; we accept or reject the bits we like or dislike.
No-one is "implanted" with anything - we are not cultural zombies who have been turned into monsters.
Keith and Mike have chosen to ignore the official statements that THERE IS NOT A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE LINKING THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY A TINY MINORITY IN BRITAIN HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT THEY COME FROM ISLAMIC COMMUNITIES, OR THEY ARE MUSLIMS - DESPITE THE FACT THAT AN OFFICIALLY CARRIED OUT SURVEY SAID EXACTLY THAT AND WARNED AGAINST DRAWING ANY SUCH INFERENCES
How is that for "infallibility - from both of them?
Jim Carroll