You thick twat.

(Rule 4, subsection B para 8.4 applies.)

So, reactionary bile that denigrates whole sections of society doesn't fall under "unkind," "impolite" or argumentative?

You can say, as Akenhateon keeps trying in his simple childish fashion, that gay people aren't really married, and that they can't form a secure family structure, yet Goofus is offensive? (He is, but I was referring to the term.)

Don't you think there are any gay people who read Mudcat then? Don't you think rational respectable people have every right to feel offended by hatred, regardless of whether it is aimed at them? Perhaps I should call you Jack after all. As in "I'm alright Jack."

Clearly, whoever puts themselves up as self styled guardian of some fictitious rule book shouldn't be you. You exhibit no sense of proportion, no sense of reality and make a point of shouting at people who question bigotry.

Perhaps a view could be made of that too.