When Akenaton says I support an organisation, it seems to be on the basis of knowing it exists. I also know what they set out to do. They support people who are gay in achieving the equality in society they have every legal right to. (Unless you wear a dog collar, then apparently you can feel sorry for them but just like for women, not allow them equality. Nobody said the law was perfect.)

Akenaton says in one breath that I support them and that someone who used to work for them happened to be a paedophile, so why am I supporting that organisation?

The logic behind that is rather distasteful, let alone disgusting. As the paedophile worked for them in their Scottish branch, I wonder if his logic that paedophilia and gay are linked, whether he feels paedophilia and Scottish are similarly linked?

As the moderators feel it best to call a spade an earth inverting horticultural implement, I shall refrain to comment too far about that rather extraordinary slur and perhaps ask Akenaton to help us understand what he is saying?

Perhaps he may also explain how knowing the existence leads to supporting? After all, he seems to know a hell of a lot more about them than I do...