Steve Shaw - PM
Date: 29 Jan 14 - 09:10 PM

>>>Still, he comes on here to either be patronised politely by Bill or to be vilified for his professed stupidity, which, in my book, is by far the better way to deal with these confounded eejits.<<<



I said, "As you have stated in reference to pete, your aim is to vilify."

You said. "Your aim appears to be to misrepresent. "

Though I did not quote you exactly, because of the way you tend to weasel your way to a point that tends be very complicated, I am sure I paraphrased what you did say accurately. I certainly did NOT aim to "misrepresent" what you said.

If you wish to tell us that you do not vilify pete and that you do not intend to do so in future I would be very happy to withdraw my comment about what your "aim" is.