From: GUEST,Stim - PM
Date: 03 Feb 14 - 06:33 PM

"No I have not heard of scientific racism. I suspect it very much like militant atheism. A construct to make religious nutters feel better."

Really, Dave? Why would you think something like that? And do they let you go outside by yourself?

Followed by

From: GUEST,Stim - PM
Date: 04 Feb 14 - 01:23 PM

I am not arguing with you, Dave, just pointing things out so that anyone who is interested can follow up on them--if you'd Googled Shockley, or "The Bell Curve" or "Scientific Racism" you might have gotten my original point, and maybe even had something to say yourself, but you didn't.

Sorry for being sarcastic, but your statement about "religious nutters" had nothing to do with anything, and sometimes I yield to the impulse...

Adding contradiction to the already poor flow I'm, afraid Stim. Lets look at the record so far.

I asked you to "Point me to the section where it says kill everyone who disagrees with this dogma." in the works you quote. You just ignored the question.

You say "Anyone that is interested can look up etc. etc." Yes, anyone that is interested can. You are throwing them in the arena. You tell us where they preach hatred. Sidesteping the issue.

I answered a question, quite genuinely, with "No, I have not heard of them". No shame in not knowing. You imply I am not fit to be let out on my own because I don't know. Abuse instead of reason.

You say "religious nutters has nothing to do with anything". It has everything to do with what I have been saying. What would you call people who kill, maim and torture for their religion? I call them nutters. If any scientist urged others to do the same I would call them nutters too. Can you find us any?

You apologise for being sarcastic. I detect no sarcasm in your post. Trying to stop Jack quoting the rules at you by any chance?

One thing we can agree on. You are not arguing.

DtG