I wasn't aware I'd lost any arguments. Or won any, for that matter. I don't post here with any of that in mind. Also, I don't hover over my keyboard all day like a hawk, as Wacko appears to, ready to pounce on the next reply as soon as it arrives. I've been doing a bit of shopping, cooking, reading up on stuff, playing a tune or six, listening to some Schumann, Mozart and Grainger, snoozing (it's my age) and going to see the lovely big waves that are currently ransacking our Cornish coastline. It's called "getting out more", Wacko. I suppose coming to the computer for the first time today so late on does have the disadvantage of my having to read all at once a load of guff from several sour-grapes merchants, but hey ho.   

I have no way of knowing obviously that for simple organisms and genes that all combinations of the 4 DNA letters have been tried.

So why did you say it then? And what's with this "tried" nonsense? Actually, what does this whole nonsensical sentence mean?

Snailieboy, I neither want nor care about your near-sympathy. You rarely make any sort of substantial point because you're obsessed with having a go at me (don't stop, I do enjoy it), simply because I stated, accurately, that evolution is true. I haven't counted, but I reckon at a guess that about 80% to 90% of your recent posts mention me, often in that rather portentous and silly way you have of typing my name in bold at the head of the post. Now my having said it again about evolution, there's little doubt that you'll go off on it all over again. I've just made myself a giant stack of popcorn.