theres no way I can respond to everything here, and have another life with other interests and responsibilities.
did ham say that noah employed no other labour, or was that just nyes assumption.
I don't know, as the text don't say, but either way it was a long time building.

stu, I did read most of the link accusing hams scientist of lying/and/or not reading the e coli report. of course, I cannot argue the details but it did seem to me that the writer went on to say much the same thing only in different terminology. I think ,I am right in saying that neither Nye nor ham are fully fledged scientists, and therefore accusing ham of lies or wilful ignorance is unwarranted. he answered as he understood it.

a few times, Nye asserted that creation teaching would hamper development of science, but failed to show how so. in fact hams citing of highly qualified scientists past and present testifies against that assertion.