The press was not government controlled.

Your case has been entirely based on your historians
That is true.
The subject is History.
Where does your case come from???????

you have no arguments other thean the cut-'n-pastes you have carefully selected

Not carefully selected.
There were none I needed to reject.
I always gave the link so they could be read in their correct context.

The two documentaries screened so far, plus the War Of Words R4 programme, endorse my stated views exactly.
I have provided actual statements made to camera by the presenter as proof.

You can provide not one single living historian saying anything to contradict my 3 stated views.
That is because there are none.

INSTEAD OF JUST CLAIMING THAT THERE ARE SOME WHO DO NOT SUPPORT MY VIEWS, PRODUCE ONE.

Just one would be something Jim.
You have had over three months now.