"as gould said " the idea of a fully impartial scientist is self serving myth...""

But, the point is that a 'real' scientist (as opposed to a 'creationist scientist' - whatever that may be) AIMS for impartiality - and, being human, may occasionally fail to achieve it ... possibly ...?

Nevertheless, a 'creationist scientist' (whatever that may be) is most definitely NOT, by any stretch of the imagination, impartial! A 'creationist scientist' (whatever that may be) starts off by knowing all of the answers ('it wuz God wot did it') and merely expends effort in order to demolish any competing descriptions of reality. That is NOT a scientific endeavour!