Remind me to put speech marks around everything I don't like. So from now on, in my posts, you might observe the following:

The "Tory" party

the "Archbishop of Canterbury"

the "Pope"

The secretary of state for education "Michael Gove"

"Catholic" schools

the former presidential candidate "Sarah Palin"

the "Temperance" League

"Sheffield" Wednesday

"pete"

"Wacko"

Ake, you knew bloody well what you were doing with those quote marks, and, as for you, Wacko, you are defending the indefensible. The indefensible in this case being a rabid homophobe. So what conclusion about your own predilections are we to come to, Wacko? At the very least you are in sympathy with the disgraceful outpourings of a very nasty homophobe. So are you a homophobia apologist? Or worse?