You tell us you are a very important administrator, but what background do you have in military tactics?
Is the answer none?
Experts in that field, military historians, tell us the the British Army was effectively and competently led in WW1.

You are entitled to your opinion, based as it is on nothing but your own non-existent knowledge.
I am more influenced by the thoroughly informed, expert opinion of military historians.
Why would anyone be remotely interested in your opinion of something you know nothing about, and reject that of people who have made it their life study?