The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #153464   Message #3603585
Posted By: Jack the Sailor
21-Feb-14 - 02:43 PM
Thread Name: BS: Darwin's Witnesses
Subject: RE: BS: Darwin's Witnesses
Bill, pete accused you of saying that you tried to say that carbon dating can be used to prove that dinosaurs existed 65,000,000 years ago and snottily dismissed you as being dumber that "even Steve."

If he knew better. He was lying. If he didn't know better he lied by pretending to know what he was talking about. Either way, he is not honest. He is playing a game, Ken Ham's game, where rule one is spew Bullshit, rule two, when you are cornered, feign innocence.

He is polite. He is not honest.

pete, 70,000 is more than 6,000, there is no known process whereby a year underwater can make 6,000 year old biological material look like it has spent 70,000 years in a dry place. If you want to, you can scientifically test that for a few hundred dollars. So could Ham.

You need a stick, a bucket, some water and some money for lab fees.