From: Bill D - PM
Date: 24 Feb 14 - 06:46 PM

Thanks for this Bill, very interesting indeed.

"perhaps actual scientist can cite experiments [observable, repeatable] that validate evolutionism....and stop insulting scientists that question Darwin dogma! "

Here's one actual scientist who has posted links to papers that do exactly this, and indeed the Blount paper quoted in the Nye/Ham debate is pertinent to this subject. It's up to YOU to disprove the theory to the satisfaction of other scientists, not for them to convince you; this is what all of us engaged in actual research have to do. A theory has to be falsifiable, so get to it. For the hundredth time - find a horse in Cambrian sediments.


"I too will remain with what I see as logical, and squares with my worldview"

This is as perfect a demonstration of confirmation bias as you could ever hope to hear from a creationist. Thunderous applause!


"these are things that an atheist must believe because of an a priori commitment to naturalistic causes, whatever the evidence."

Are you sure about that? Methinks you might be getting confused here.