The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #153942 Message #3611309
Posted By: Stilly River Sage
20-Mar-14 - 07:28 PM
Thread Name: BS: Cosmos
Subject: RE: BS: Cosmos
Pete said:
stilly says evolution is true, is a valid statement [more or less] then concedes it involves conjecture.
more accurately it is a philosophical/religious statement.
You don't understand what I was saying, or you ignore it, Pete. Conjecture doesn't not mean it has to be in the realm of philosophy or religion. I'm not letting you dictate the terms of the discussion, so your myopic argument with no support isn't allowed by me (or many others with sound scientific understanding) to serve as the diametric and equally weighted opposite to the science we're discussing. The religious position as you represent it has no more power than children arguing "yes" "no" "yes" "no" on the playground. It's the old adage, saying it over and over doesn't make it any more correct.
Steve Shaw, you keep calling people names and your posts are going to disappear. You have been warned.
SRS