You have no idea what most historians deny as you haven't read any of them - so to say that "most historians believe" anything is a blatant fabrication - an invention on your part.
What you are being presented with here are a list of facts from three historians - so far - there will be more
The last item came with opinions which are directly related to facts.
All the facts are linked to footnotes which are traceable so the idea that they are invented is out of the question - they can be checked because they can be followed up by any anybody who reads the books - all documented and annotated.
You are not in a position to challenge the facts (not until you read a book) so you hide behind your cut-'n-pastes - all of which have fallen apart on you - every single one.
Another big one coming up I'm afraid.
It doesn't matter that you have not responded to any ogf the facts - you are out of this - you've never been in, just a pest who has trolled your way into a discussion to prove "Britain didn't do nuffin'" as usual.
Facts man - facts, that what will make a point - not the selective politicking you constantly indulge in
Jim Carroll